A list of readings, journals, and presses that I once deeply loved that are now gone:
Also, when I was searching for “Abjective,” this was the first hit that came up: http://www.abjective.net/109.html
For a while, my tumblr was linked to jamestaddadcox.com. I let it slide after I decided that I didn’t really want my name as a domain (I pictured sending out emails from email@example.com, for example). Now jamestaddadcox.com has been taken over by a Japanese company advertising “The Bridal Hair Removal Salon in Shizuoka for Marriage.” You can go there right now. It’s here: http://jamestaddadcox.com/
Things I’m currently reading:
The Whiskey Baron, Jon Sealy (picked up from a bookstore in Charleston SC, which seems appropriate)
The Concise Book of Lying, Evelin Sullivan
Sky Rat, Rauan Klassnik
At Swim-Two-Birds, Flann O’Brien
Thirteenz, Daniela Olszewska (free echap from Nap Press)
At this moment I am eating a cheese that has walnuts in it and my advice to you, if you find a cheese with walnuts in it, my advice is to eat it, especially if you cut up an apple and eat it on the apple. What will my life be when this cheese is gone.
Russ Woods wrote this book and I am excited to help put it out into the world. Coming 2014 from Artifice.
1. Feelings are important, and generally shouldn’t be hurt, all other things being equal.
2. Many things outweigh feelings being hurt, such as, being able to continue in one’s chosen career, such as justice, such as
3. What is it about the internet that makes us worse people?
4. The lack of a face?
5. None of us are responsible for patriarchy. All of us are responsible for injustice.
6. It is okay to say that you are “tired of being nice.” It is okay to say that it “isn’t your responsibility to educate others.” It’s okay to be a human being. It’s okay to do exactly what is expected of a human being in your position.
6.b. Note that this makes you neither better nor worse than other human beings in other positions, doing exactly what is expected of them.
6.c. To categorically claim that people from an oppressed group are better than people from an oppressing group is to claim that there is something essential about the oppression. That the particular oppression is anything more than a historical contingency.
6.d. Is to claim, in fact, that there is something that “makes sense” about the oppressed group being oppressed, or the oppressing group oppressing.
6.e. Who happened to cross an ocean first. Who happened to have gunpowder.
7. The contingent fact of one’s being in a position of oppression does not apriori make one a better person than the people who contingently are in a position of oppressing.
7.b. Being a better person than them does.
8. Bullying someone who is ostensibly a member of the oppressor group, when it is safe to do so, is a perfectly understandable reaction to oppression.
8.b. The fact of its being so understandable is the issue, ethically speaking.
9. To suspend the human, to act outside of what is understandable—to refuse to hurt others when one has every reason to—
10. is what?
(cf http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/resignation/, cf http://lunalunamag.com/2013/12/15/leigh-stein-vs-htmlgiant-why-we-have-to-be-our-own-vida/, cf http://htmlgiant.com/word-spaces/open-letter-to-htmlgiant-the-sexism-stops-here/, cf http://htmlgiant.com/massive-people/the-zambreno-doll/, cf http://web.archive.org/web/20100124211426/http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/the-legend-of-zelda/)
At first glance this seems like a regular shipping harbor from the year 1937, but upon closer inspection, the time traveller is Visible
I haven’t really been able to get into Dhalgren yet, which is a weird thing to say considering I just spent two hours reading it without necessarily intending to. But I think that if this book hadn’t come so highly recommended—if it weren’t for the blurb by Lethem, the forward by Gibson, and especially if I hadn’t been told that, at some point, something happens that makes it an entirely different book—I’d probably have stopped reading by now. This book is pulling me along on pure mystery: This can’t possibly be the book, I think—so what is it?
A book that becomes an entirely different book: This is an idea that I’ve always been attracted to. But what can it actually mean? Is there going to be something that changes my experience of reading the first four hundred pages? Certainly, the possibility of “an entirely different book” has already colored that experience—I don’t think that my reading of these first 400 pages would be the same if I weren’t expecting something to happen to put those pages in a new light. But it seems nonsensical to say that something could happen that would actually change my experience of those 400 pages. I have had my experience of them, it was what it was, nothing is going to change it. At the same time, of course, I can’t in any way undo it, nor do I have to or do I get to repeat it. What I am relying on, I suppose, is not an actual change in that experience, but a future experience that incorporates my memory of that experience, in some way that I will find remarkable or surprising.
Meaning is nontemporal, or rather, runs backwards in time; meaning can only attach itself to the past. Justice is what the present owes the past. Is it, then, that in the book that becomes an entirely different book, there is more meaning, precisely because there is more to be redeemed?
(Is all justice a form of meaning? Vice versa? What exactly is the connection between these terms? Each of them, it seems, involves an operation of the present on the past; or rather, an operation of the present on itself, for the sake of the past.)